Eternalized in Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution is the idea of intellectual property rights, granted for “limited times.” Since our nation’s inception, copyright has acted as a powerful incentive for creation, however, in recent years, the paradigm of copyright has changed dramatically.
Copyright, once an exclusive monopoly for 14 years, has expanded to restrict reproduction for 70 years past the death of the creator. Further, its breadth of protection has come to include much more than just copies. This change, coupled with the advent of digitalism, means that legal restrictions are building a barrier between the incredible power of modern technology and the possibilities for future creation.
The law needs to mirror culture and society. However, in the way are the powerful media and publishing lobbies. Hollywood firms alone donate hundreds of millions of dollars to Congressional members in order to enact stricter copyright legislation.
My proposal, the Creative Consumer Copyright Act would introduce property formalities, a searchable database and shorter terms for copyright. Just as a car or trademark is registered, under my system, copyright would require a simple, online registration to receive the benefits. In addition, a renewable term of 10 years would allow creators to only restrict reproduction for as long as they desire.
In reality, the program would require financial backing to both raise awareness and influence Congress. A national advertising campaign would inform consumers that many of the possibilities of the digital age are threatened by litigious copyright owners who have the support of a draconian copyright regime. Similarly, Congressional members need to recognize the economic stagnation caused by overzealous protection.
As long as the legislators turn to the deep pockets of copyright proponents, the Creative Consumer Copyright Act will remain an under-funded dream, but where money is no object, it flourishes.
