Thursday, November 29, 2007

Think the Reputation Economy is New? Think Again

What motivates the Wikipedia contributor or Linux programmer? It can't be financial since these endeavors are non-profit. A lot of recent scholarship has focused on non-fiscal returns including what has come to be known as the "reputation economy" where one's contributions become, in sum, reputation signals to peers, prospective employers and others.

Well, it turns out, this isn't a new phenomenon. A nice survey of both the historical and current copyright debate in the Globe and Mail shares the anecdote of the 18th Century British poet, Daniel Defoe. Mr. Defoe's satirical poem "A True-Born Englishman" netted him little profit due to the 80,000 "pirated" copies. However, the free distribution made him popular.

"This wide readership helped establish his literary reputation, making him one of the most famous men in England and assuring that his future works would find an audience. Even the King befriended him. For much of the rest of his life, Defoe would refer to himself simply as the author of The True-Born Englishman."
As Tim O'Reilly said, the greatest threat an artist faces is obscurity, not piracy.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Blog Recommendation

The Michigan Telecommunication and Technology Law Review recently launched a blog which has some really great posts including a history of YouTube legal disputes and warrantless wiretapping lawsuits. Check it out.

Monday, November 12, 2007

The Presidential Candidates on Tech Policy

I've always been a fan of Michael Arrington's TechCrunch which rose to prominence covering Internet business. He is doing us all a great benefit by leveraging his popularity to interview the leading Presidential candidates on technology policy. Even further, he is allowing users to voice their concerns.

So far, he has posted interviews with John McCain and Mitt Romney. Be sure to check out TalkCrunch for further interviews.

Colleges to Universities: Filter the Net or Lose Financial Aid

As I am now a college student, my recent post over on the Students for Free Culture blog is of particular interest to me:


Fred Benenson over at Free Culture @ NYU is spreading the word about a Congressional bill which is under consideration which would eliminate student loans at schools which do not filter the Internet. As Fred puts it:

This bill contains wording that, if passed into law, would jeopardize federal aid for universities if they refused to filter their student’s internet access. In other words, the bill is designed to force universities to police their student’s internet connections in a way that no other ISPs in the world do. Besides encouraging a violation of network neutrality on campuses, this bill demands universities to do something that is technically impossible — how is NYU’s router supposed to be able to tell the difference between a Creative Commons licensed video podcast that you’re downloading via Miro and an “illegal” file your roommate is getting off of a file sharing network? The point is they can’t — no technology has been invented that can properly discover whether a file is “legal” or not (consider how difficult it is for a judge to decide whether a use is fair, and then think of trying to create a chip that would do it) and no technology will ever be invented to do this.

The dubiously titled “College Opportunity and Affordability Act of 2007” (coming in at a staggering 747 pages, the relevant part is from pg. 411-413) is a bad deal and we need to let our representatives know it before they vote on it on Wednesday at 9am.

Take the five minutes to call your representative and let them know how dangerous this is to free speech and higher education. Committee members include:

Democrats

Republicans

Consider saying something like the following:

Hi, the Committee on Education and Labor of which ______ is a member is considering a bill entitled “The College Opportunity and Affordability Act of 2007″ which would strip universities of federal aid money if they do not filter the internet their students use. This is dangerous for free speech, education and the affordability of college. Please have ______ work to amend this.

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Falsely Accused Woman Sues RIAA

The ABA Journal has an article about an Oregon woman who was falsely accused of downloading music by the RIAA. Following alleged intimidation, fraud and negligence, the RIAA dropped the lawsuit, but this principled woman is forming a class-action suit to stop the RIAA's bully tactics.

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

The Open Handset Alliance

As a college student, I spend plenty of my time in class where my cell phone needs to be silent. However, the vibration mode is not desirable while in my dorm or outside. So, I am forced to manually switch between modes a number of times daily.

While this is obviously not an enormous burden, one might easily imagine a cell phone application which would mute one's phone during certain times each day. Weekly staff meetings would not be interrupted; classes would proceed without punctuation from an errant ring tone.

However, the locked down cell phones which permeate the American market make this entrepreneurial task an impossible one. The omnipresent mobile phones (of which there are 3 billion globally), remain a closed platform. This limits innovation in the form of new applications.

Led by Google, the new Open Handset Alliance seeks to upset this status quo by providing a platform for development on mobile phones. Major industry members including Motorola, HTC, Sprint & T-Mobile are joining forces to end the prohibitive mobile market.

Notably absent, however, are the largest cell phone carriers, Verizon and ATT, who will still have the ability to lock-in customers through artificial market barriers like they do with the iPhone or other handsets. Yet, this is undoubtedly a powerful step towards making mobile computing more like Internet computing and the members should be applauded for their leadership.