Monday, January 22, 2007

Court Decides Against Plaintiffs in Kahle

Reuters reports that the 9th Circuit Court has decided in favor of the respondents and ruled against Brewster Kahle in his case against copyright term extensions. As was painfully obvious from the oral arguments, the Court failed to see the difference between the Eldred case and this one.

"They (the plaintiffs) make essentially the same argument, in different form, that the Supreme Court rejected in Eldred. It fails here as well," the eight-page opinion written by Ninth Circuit Judge Jerome Farris stated.

The full decision is here.

See my previous coverage of Kahle v. Gonzalez.

Update: The Stanford Law Center for Internet and Society acted on behalf of the plaintiffs (Kahle and Prelinger). Christopher Sprigman, attorney at the Center, has his reaction here.

1 comments:

qishaya said...

Original christian shoes are first category in alter. They are so much appealing louboutin shoes so, ample of women can not pause to get their hands on them. cheap christian louboutin However, these shoes are not economical. christian louboutin So adequate of women cannot present these shoes. christian louboutin heels Christian Louboutin Replica is presenting the textbook thing for these people. christian louboutin sandals It is present masses of fashionable shoes in an economical rate. christian pumps You know that unique shoes are posh to buy. christian sandals Nevertheless do not think that exchange a shoe with christian louboutin pumps magnificent create of top trait is hard. Now a time model are presented. louboutin pumps But if you hardship attribute cargo look discount christian louboutin for these replicas in a trustworthy position & set an order for your beloved shoes christian louboutin sale